The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Survival of Adult Female Elk in Yellowstone Following Wolf Restoration
Abstract
Counts of northern Yellowstone elk (Cervus elaphus) in northwestern Wyoming and adjacent Montana, USA, have decreased at an average rate of 6–8% per year since wolves (Canis lupus) were reintroduced in 1995. Population growth rates of elk are typically sensitive to variations in adult female survival; populations that are stable or increasing exhibit high adult female survival. We used survival records for 85 radiocollared adult female elk 1–19 years old to estimate annual survival from March 2000 to February 2004. Weighted average annual survival rates were approximately 0.83 (95% CI = 0.77–0.89) for females 1–15 years old and 0.80 (95% CI = 0.73–0.86) for all females. Our estimates were much lower than the rate of 0.99 observed during 1969–1975 when fewer elk were harvested by hunters, wolves were not present, and other predators were less numerous. Of 33 documented deaths included in our analysis, we attributed 11 to hunter harvest, 14 to predation (10 wolf, 2 unknown, 1 cougar [Puma concolor], and 1 bear [Ursus sp.]), 6 to unknown causes, and 2 to winter-kill. Most deaths occurred from December through March. Estimates of cause-specific annual mortality rates were 0.09 (0.05–0.14) for all predators, 0.08 (0.04–0.13) for hunting, and 0.07 (0.03–0.11) for wolves specifically. Wolf-killed elk were typically older (median = 12 yr) than hunter-killed elk (median = 9 yr, P = 0.03). However, elk that winter outside the park where they were exposed to hunting were also younger (median = 7 yr) than elk that we did not observe outside the park (median = 9 yr, P < 0.01). Consequently, differences in ages of elk killed by wolves and hunters may reflect characteristics of elk exposed to various causes of mortality, as well as differences in susceptibility. Unless survival rates of adult females increase, elk numbers are likely to continue declining. Hunter harvest is the only cause of mortality that is amenable to management at the present time.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The causes of elk decline have shifted from harvest to predation, first by grizzly bears and cougars, then by wolves.This shift has also been corroborated by analyses of the causes of mortality for radio-collared elk (Evans et al. 2006, Hamlin et al. 2009).”
From Trophic Cascades in a Multicausal World: Isle Royale and Yellowstone (2014) · cites this paper as Evans et al. 2006
In the citing paper
“The finding that wolf offtake explains only half of the observed decline in uncorrected herd counts is not a new result and aligns well with previous research that has inferred that wolf predation rates (combined with other drivers such as density and snowpack) cannot fully explain the observed declines in elk abundance [18], [19], [22], [23] or juvenile survival [20], [43].”
From Ecosystem Scale Declines in Elk Recruitment and Population Growth with Wolf Colonization: A Before-After-Control-Impact Approach (2014) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Annual female survival in ‘prime-age’ animals in northern Yellowstone was 0.99 prior to wolf reintroduction but has subsequently decreased by 14% to 19% [15], [22].”
From Ecosystem Scale Declines in Elk Recruitment and Population Growth with Wolf Colonization: A Before-After-Control-Impact Approach (2014) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 41 · Cited by 50
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- Ballard, 2000, Journal of Wildlife Management, 64, 500
- Barber, 2005, Yellowstone Science, 13, 37
- Boyce, 1993, Ecological issues on reintroducing wolves into Yellowstone National Park. National Park Service Scientific Monograph 22, 234
- Bureau, 1992, Mortality and seasonal distribution of elk in an area recently colonized by wolves
- Carbyn, 1983, Journal of Wildlife Management, 47, 963
- Cole, 1997, Journal of Wildlife Management, 61, 1115
- Cook, 2004, Journal of Mammalogy, 85, 714
- Despain, 1990, Yellowstone vegetation
- Eberhardt, 1996, Journal of Wildlife Management, 60, 369
- Eberhardt, 2002, Ecology, 83, 2841
- Farnes, 1999, Final report CA 1268-1-9017
- Freddy, 1987, The White River elk herd: a perspective, 1960–85
- Garrott, 2003, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 81, 33
- Gese, 1995, American Midland Naturalist, 133, 36
- Hamlin, 2002, Federal Aid Project W-154-R
- Houston, 1982, The northern Yellowstone elk
- Huggard, 1993a, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 71, 130
- Huggard, 1993b, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 71, 140
- Kreeger, 1997, Canadian Journal of Zoology, 75, 1549
- Kunkel, 1999, Journal of Wildlife Management, 63, 1082
- Kunkel, 1999, Journal of Wildlife Management, 63, 901
- Lemke, 2003, Gardiner late elk hunt annual report
- Lemke, 1998, Intermountain Journal of Sciences, 4, 1
- Leptich, 1991, Proceedings of Elk Vulnerability Symposium, 126
- Mack, 1993a, U.S. Department of Interior National Park Service Scientific Monograph NPS/NRYELL/NRSM-93/22, 49
- Mack, 1993b, U.S. Department of Interior National Park Service Scientific Monograph NPS/NRYELL/NRSM-93/22, 270
- Mech, 2003, Wolves: behavior, ecology, and conservation, 131
- Mech, 2001, Journal of Wildlife Management, 65, 998
- Murphy, 1998, The ecology of the cougar (Puma concolor) in the Northern Yellowstone Ecosystem: interactions with prey, bears and humans
- Peterson, 2003, Wolves: behavior, ecology and conservation, 104
- Singer, 1989, BioScience, 39, 716
- Smith, 2003, BioScience, 53, 330
- Smith, 2004b, Yellowstone Center for Resources YCR-NR-2004-04
- Taper, 2002, Journal of Wildlife Management, 66, 106
- Unsworth, 1993, Journal of Wildlife Management, 57, 495
- Varley, 2006, Ecological Modelling, 193, 315
- Vucetich, 2005, Oikos, 111, 259
- White, 1985, Royal Society of New Zealand, Biology of Deer Production, 22, 51
- White, 2005, Wildlife Society Bulletin, 33, 942
- White, 2003, Yellowstone Center for Resources YCR-NR-20040-02
Metadata
- Authors
- EVANS, S. B., MECH, L. D., WHITE, P. J., & SARGEANT, G. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- United States Geological Survey (US)
- National Park Service (US)
- Corresponding author
- MECH, L. DAVID
- Venue
- Journal of Wildlife Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-12
- Volume
- 70
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1372-1378
- ISSN
- 0022-541X (ISSN-L)
- 1937-2817
- OpenAlex
- W2113315506
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Wildlife Management (publishedVersion)
- Lincoln (University of Nebraska) (submittedVersion)
- BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
- Keywords
- elk, red deer, wolf reintroduction, wolf, adult female survival, annual survival rate, cause-specific mortality, predator predation, hunting harvest, winterkill, Yellowstone National Park
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review